Random Movements

by: Jermy Leeuwis MSc of MusicRemedy.com


Jermy Leeuwis MSc (my Facebookmy LinkedInmy MySpacemy Twitter) Entrepreneur/ CEO MusicRemedy.com

Hi there, on this blog I will write about my online (i.e., website, music, etc...) and offline activities. My posts will mostly be short and the topic will be random within my range of activities. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate and email me.

Word-of-Mouth

  • Read more about electronic Word-of-Mouth
  • Listening to:

  • Big Twins
  • Cage
  • Masta Ace
  • Linky Stinky

  • All That's Fab
  • Always Hustle
  • Gowhere Hip Hop
  • MissTheda
  • Music is my Boyfriend

  • MusicRemedy Friendly
  • XFN Friendly
  • hCard Friendly
  • Mon Sep 28

    LCD vs Plasma: Meet its Winner

    LCD, right? Most people tend to choose for the more popular one. Are they right, or not? Naturally, like most decisions this is a subjective opinion but nevertheless facts are facts.

    LCD vs Plasma

    We start with LCD’s negative points:

    • response times;
    • black is *not* black;
    • backlight bleeding (most visible in a dark room or at night);
    • can’t display HDTV fully/properly due to limited lines;
    • dead pixels which can *not* be repared;
    • best quality in front of the tv.

    Positive:

    • cheap;
    • brightness;
    • good for computer hook-ups;
    • design-wise;
    • lite weight.

    Plasma negative points:

    • burn-in remains possible;
    • expensive;
    • consume more power;
    • heavy;
    • in sunlight more reflections.

    Positive:

    • black IS black;
    • no quality loss viewing from different angels;
    • no response times;
    • HDTV can be displayed in 1024i/p.

    Conclusion: plasma wins by a long-shot when you want the best quality. Below a 1000 bucks you get the best value when buying a LCD. Presumably that is why most people buy a LCD and take for granted the lack of quality.

    eXTReMe Tracker